This piece is a joke. Why is it that leftists believe that the entire rationale for ever criticizing (or voting for) a politician is based on their genetics or sexual orientation? It couldn’t be their bad economic priorities. It couldn’t be their fringe ideas. It couldn’t be their feckless foreign policy. It has to be voters “couldn’t handle having a [insert your preferred identity politics or not in the mainstream label] president”.
Make America Great Again has never had a racial component. It’s always been about exercising our considerable power to influence the politics of other countries. It’s been about returning power to the states and the people as described in the Constitution. It’s been about minimizing the money every citizen has been forced to give to a bloated, wasteful, often ineffectual, federal government through the confiscation of taxes.
President Trump is dismantling everything DEI because merit and qualifications should matter more than race/gender/sexual preference characteristics. Do you want the pilot of your aircraft to be the better aviator or of a preferred race? Do you want the laborer building your house to be the better carpenter or of a preferred gender? Is whether or not your surgeon belongs to the LGBTQ community of real concern when you are on the operating table or do you just want the better surgeon?
You are free to make your personal decisions from whom you receive goods and services. But, expending taxpayers dollars should never be influenced by DEI labels.
Yes, slavery was a terrible thing. Americans fought a war against other Americans to end it. We have endeavored since then to become a more perfect union. Americans outlawed Democrat policies of poll taxes, literacy tests, and Jim Crow laws through the passage of the 14th Amendment. Incidents of racial violence by the Democrat’s militant arm, the Ku Klux Klan, and all others have been rightfully punished and that particular organization relegated to a minor, practically nonexistent status.
There was an election last year. America made its choice. I’m not exactly sure what the “new direction” with respect to an election of VP Harris would have been. She identified no real changes in policies from the Biden Administration. She indicated she would’ve done nothing different had she been President rather than VP during that time. Her one often stated goal was to stop alleged price gouging.
But, that policy “difference” begs the question: if price gouging was occurring during the Biden Administration, why wasn’t that being addressed? If the VP was so concerned about it, why wasn’t it something she talked about until she was installed as the Democrat nominee for President without a single voter voting to make her the nominee for that office? Obviously, she was desperate for a campaign issue separating herself from the disastrous administration of which she was a part.
Yes, there was an election last November. Americans decided that they wanted no part of a de facto fourth Obama term. They voted in favor of policies that would reduce inflation, secure our southern border, lower the price of energy, keep us out of foreign wars, enforce the rule of law, enact a strong foreign policy, ensure American businesses were treated fairly by other countries, as well as ensure the ability of girls and women to not have to compete athletically against biological males nor tolerate them in their private spaces.
